Andrés Enrique Artunduaga Garzón
Angélica María Rojas Isaza
Derly Tatiana Moz Muñoz
Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia, Colombia
Educación y Humanismo 20(35): pp. 57-73. Julio-Diciembre, 2018.
DOI
:
http://dx
10.17081/eduhum.20.35.2658
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá
practitioners´perspective: a literature review
Impacto de la reflexión pedagógica en la pctica docente desde la perspectiva de los
practicantes del Caquetá: una revisión literaria
Abstract
Objective: to take a deep look at the pedagogical reflection experienced in the pedagogical
practice of the English Language Teaching (ELT) program at the University of Amazonia, in
order to highlight the importance and influence of pedagogical reflection to potentiate the
teaching processes -learning of the practitioners. Method: the type of research that was used
was qualitative, was carried out through a systematic search allowed to discover twelve (12)
studies published from 2009 to 2016, where a series of factors involved in the reflection
process emerged; a) skills acquired through reflective practice, b) the strategies used to
reflect, c) cultural aspects as predictors for the preparation of both practitioners and classes
and d) the implications of the modern world in teaching. Results: The results showed that
reflective practice plays an important role when professionals in training begin to explore the
educational field because it helps them to be involved in a constant learning process.
Conclusion: The research concluded that reflective practice leads practitioners to be critical,
authentic, transformers and to be self-aware of the challenges that the educational field
brings.
Keywords: English language teaching, pedagogical reflection, practitioners, today world,
transformative teaching.
Resumen
Objetivo: Abordar la reflexión pedagógica experimentada en la práctica pedagógica del
programa Enseñanza del Idioma Inglés (ELT) en la universidad de la Amazonia, con el fin de
resaltar la importancia e influencia de la misma en la potencialización de los procesos de
enseñanza-aprendizaje de los practicantes. Método: el tipo de investigación que se utilizó fue
cualitativa, la cual se llevó a cabo a través de una búsqueda sistemática y permitió descubrir
doce (12) estudios publicados desde 2009 hasta 2016, en los que se hallaron una serie de
factores involucrados en el proceso de reflexión; a) habilidades adquiridas a través de la
práctica reflexiva, b) las estrategias utilizadas para reflexionar, c) aspectos culturales como
predictores para la preparación tanto de los practicantes como de las clases y d) las
implicaciones del mundo moderno en la enseñanza. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron
que la práctica reflexiva desempeña un papel importante cuando los profesionales en
formación comienzan a explorar el campo educativo debido a que les ayuda a involucrarse en
un proceso de aprendizaje constante. Conclusión: La investigación concluyó que la práctica
reflexiva conlleva a los practicantes a ser críticos, auténticos, transformadores y
autoconscientes de los desafíos del campo educativo.
Palabras clave: Enseñanza del inglés, reflexión pedagógica, practicantes, mundo
actual, enseñanza transformadora.
Open Access
:
Editor:
Patricia Martínez Barrios
Universidad Simón Bolívar
Correspondencia:
Andrés Artunduaga
Garzón
andre.artunduaga@udla.ed
u.co
Recibido:
04-08-17
Aceptado:
15-02-18
Publicado:
01-07-18
DOI:
http://dx
10.17081/eduhu
m.20.35.2658
Copyright © 2018 Educación
y Humanismo
57
Cómo citar este artículo (APA): Artunduaga, A., Rojas, A. & Muñoz, D. (2018). Impact of pedagogical
reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review.
Educación y
Humanismo
, 20(35), 57-73.DOI:
http://dx
10.17081/eduhum.20.35.2658
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
INTRODUCTION
Without reflection, we go blindly on our way, creating more unintended consequences, and failing to achieve
anything useful.
Margaret Wheatley
The curiosity to know how to deal with the challenges presented in the daily teaching process
lead us to look for strategies in order to figure out how to perform our teaching practicum as
English practitioners of Universidad de la Amazonia from Florencia Caquetá. Along this search
process, the idea of writing the following article arose, which is a literature review about the
importance of the pedagogical reflection (from now PR) framed in in-service teachers’ process. This
paper is mainly made to address at and to illustrate future practitioners an avenue of factors
involved in the teaching practicum and contribute to the academic growth through the writing
production.
Teaching process has become one of the biggest challenges in the academic field. The dynamic
world is asking for transformative teaching in order to meet the avalanche of changes
experimented in today society. In this sense, Bolstad, Gilbert, McDowall, Bull, Boyd & Hipkinsargue
(2012) argue that the current educational systems, structures and practices are not sufficient to
address and support the learning needs of all students in the 21st century” (p.1). according to
Maussa (2011) “teaching is conceived as a profession that demands a permanent environment and
a need for progressive professional and personal changes based on the teacher's continuous self-
reflection on his/her own practice” (p. 103, own translation). Consequently, the teacher role call for
a professional growth in every teaching issue, which is developed through a rigorous process of
reflection. However, when talking about a country like Colombia, the educational process is even
harder since education should be rethought according to the regions diversity. Hence, teachers
should be trained efficiently to be competent professionals to carry out an accurate performance.
In the XX century the PR emerged as the switch to turn on a big portal of opportunities for
teaching improvement. John Dewey (1933), who is considered a key originator of the concept of
reflection, referred to reflection as a problem solving process. However, as a reflection process
represented an antagonist role for the traditional education, it was not fully incorporated in the
teaching practice in that age. Later, in 1983 Shon followed Dewey’s idea of taking the reflection act
as a way to face the adversities lived in a classroom or a determined place. In the same line, many
scholars, educators and researchers have figured out the pedagogical reflection as a focus of
interest in the teaching process.
58
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
In this sense, Bandura (1986) claims reflective practice helps professionals to become more self-
aware and therefore better able to monitor their own practice. Moreover, reflective practice is an
understanding and learning process in which the teachers become more aware of what they
already know, what they need to improve and how to bridge that gap (Almabekova, 2010; Gibbs &
Coffey, 2004; Karm & Remmik, 2008; Killen, 2007; Nicholls, 2001; Pollard & Tann, 1993; Postareff
& Lindblom-Ylänne 2008; Runhar, Sanders & Yang, 2010; Sezer, 2008; Wallace, 1991).
The PR turned into a multifaceted process since two different stages were evolved to achieve
better outcomes in the teaching practice: reflection in action and reflection on action. Shon (1995)
defines reflection in action as an approach where educators modify and adapt the pedagogical
practice according to the challenges that emerge along the class. On the other hand, he exposes
reflection on action as the process of examining lived experiences into the classroom in order to
develop the coming classes in a better way. Through the years, different strategies to foster an
effective reflection have been implemented. As cited by Al-Issa & Al-Bulushi (2010), there are many
strategies and approaches that can be used to develop a successful reflective practice such as:
Journals, narratives, diaries and notes (Bailey, 1990; Farrell, 2003; Hatton & Smith, 1995;
Richards, 1992; Thorne & Qiang, 1996), autobiography (Pennington, 1992 & Richards, 1992),
teaching portfolios (Bullock & Hawk, 2001), action research (Gebhard, 1998), practical experience
(Hatton & Smith, 1995), collaborative talk (Farrell, 1999) and self-observation and observation of
other teachers (Farrell, 2003; Gebhard, 1998, 2005; Richards & Farrell, 2005) (p.45).
Consequently, the main aim of this review is to analyze the influence of the PR on the English
language teaching practicum, framed in cultural and modern aspects as the key axes to address the
teaching process; departing from the regional environment and taking as reference the national
and international settings. Also, this document is written essentially to get pre-service teachers and
tutors familiarized about the factors that the PR involves in order for them to have a reference
when facing the teaching practicum. In general terms, the central focus to be addressed in this
paper will be the importance of a reflective practice to achieve an effective performance in the
process of in-service teachers teaching and learning taking into account the XXI century influence
in educational contexts.
Review questions
When we as practitioners get into a classroom for the first time, we start facing challenges,
principally because of our lack of experience and the wrong conception about the main task in the
59
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
educational setting, which is not just teaching a determined subject but going beyond and
educating. Many times we wrongly try new strategies but they do not work until the moment we
learn to read the context as a result of using PR in the teaching practicum. The following questions
were formulated by questioning how this kind of process has been performed along the past nine
years in the different contexts (international, national and regional) in order to enrich the
practitioner's perspective about teaching process.
To which extent does the implementation of reflection in the pedagogical practicum helps
practitioners (and/or tutors) to perform a better teaching process framed in ELT departing from
Caquetá department?
How do the cultural and modern factors influence the pedagogical practicum of English in-
service teachers and what has been the impact of pedagogical reflection on their teaching and
learning processes based on the regional context?
METHODOLOGY
With the purpose of writing this article, it was necessary to make a qualitative analytical and
descriptive research, which was carried out through a process of recollection, focalization and
analysis of different articles, thesis, journal documents and books of regional, national and
international order related to the review topic. The data bases used were Redalyc™, Eric™, Scholar
google™ and Scielo™ and the descriptors for the electronic research included: pedagogical
reflection/ teaching practicum/ in-service teachers/ English language teaching. To synthesize this
information, a meticulous reading of the collected information was made, which was gathered in a
chart of analysis and synthesis created by the authors, taking into account the relevant aspects to
be considered in the review article. After the reading phase, a contrast and comparison process was
made among the studies to select the pertinent documents according to the authors’ criteria. As a
result, the studies analyzed to develop the present literature review were 12, published since the
year 2009 forward. One of the difficulties gotten during the recollection process was the fact that
there are not enough academic resources about reflection on teaching in the regional atmosphere.
So, an exhaustive search had to be implemented in order to find a study.
With a view to guiding this article, four central branches, which were highlighted during the
meta-analysis, will be embraced: Pedagogical Reflection: The Mirror of a Practitioner, Strategies
Used as Scaffolding to Reach the PR, transcending beyond the classroom to conquer a
transformative teaching and the modern world: dancing with post-millennial generation.
60
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
Pedagogical reflection: the mirror of a practitioner
In the view of Mar Karm (2010), the PR is a thinking process that fosters the development of
the professional identity causing changes in the actions and strategies of the coming teaching
practice. Furthermore, Dewey states that “Reflective teaching requires attitudes of open-
mindedness, responsibility and wholeheartedness” (as cited by Runhar, Sanders & Yang, 2010).
Therefore, when a practice is carried out reflectively, in-service teachers or/and educators get an
enhanced understanding, awareness and self-knowledge about the reality implied in their role as
teachers. Keeping this in mind, six of the twelve (50%) analyzed studies concluded that RP helps
practitioners to develop awareness, which makes them grow professionally (Carrington & Selva,
2010; Gulnara & Valeeva, 2014; Gungor, 2016; Minott, 2011; Taole, 2012; Yıldız, Geçikli &
Yeşilyurt, 2016). Hence, the PR provides the lens in which teachers or student teachers can see
their teaching process in an authentic way.
The pedagogical reflection process also sparks critical thinking in the student teachers’
performance. Critical thinking is a process of analysis and self-evaluation extended beyond the
classroom that allows individuals to react and respond to the circumstances lived in the daily
teaching practice (Boody, 2008; Brookfield, 1995; Cranton, 1996; Minott 2011; Rodríguez, 2009).
According to the studies made in Colombia and Malaysia by Rodríguez (2009) and Goh and
Matthew (2011) respectively, the PR helps in-service teachers to become critical thinkers, enriching
their skills as educational agent. It is important to highlight that the critical reflection does not come
naturally since it is necessary to provide opportunities to student teachers for reflecting (Yang,
2009). Thus, the role of the bachelor degree programs linked with Educative Institutions is to offer
ST the space and the guide in their initial teaching process and student teachers need to be willing
to get immersed into the reflection process to develop critical skills and reach a continuous
reflective practice. On the other hand, the critical reflection turns into a tool where teachers put
themselves in students’ shoes (Pretorius & Ford, 2016) in order to identify the needs of the
educational context and at the same time the goals to be reached.
The reflective practice plays an important role when practitioners start to explore the
educational field. From our own experience as novice teachers, we could realize that the act of
reflection leads us to get familiarized with the diversity of worlds present in a classroom, with the
purpose of addressing the future teaching performance. Also, it enables us to identify our strengths
and weaknesses making a further growth possible (Runhar, Sanders & Yang, 2010). In the same
way, most studies revealed that PR masters student teachers to have a constant learning process
from the daily difficulties and achievements. When practitioners are exposed to real educational
61
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
contexts difficulties, they acquire through reflection the ability to deal with the obstacles presented
inside the classroom. Regarding the English language teaching, innovative strategies and methods
to problem solving the current scholar setting circumstances and catch the students’ attention are
required. Thus, English in-service teachers should implement strategies that not only foster the
language production and comprehension skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing) in students
but also that generate curiosity, impact and interest tied to their context. In this sense, Spilková
(2004) states that one of the responsibilities of a teacher is to use teaching strategies and methods
that provide meaningful learning. Therefore, it should be given importance to the current education
students’ learning styles and preferences using the PR.
Strategies used as scaffolding to reach the PR
The implementation the PR requires to put in practice strategies as mean to develop it. A
Strategy is a plan or method for achieving any specific goal (word Reference). In terms of reflection
on the education field, the strategies are scaffoldings implemented as a means to collect data and
to evaluate about what is done and how it is done from a deeper perspective in order to reach an
accurate PR. In the recent years, several strategies have been experienced for developing a PR.
Among the research analyzed, it is important to highlight that one study applied by Gungor (2016)
in Turkey was the only one which used different strategies at the same time to promote the
reflection on student teachers such as videos, microteaching sessions, reflective journals and a
questionnaire. However, there is not a big difference when comparing the strategies used in the
international, national and regional contexts, such strategies referred to interviews, questionnaires
and journals mainly. Thus, the questionnaire is the most implemented strategy to enable reflective
practice.
In the authors’ case, the strategy they were asked to develop was a pedagogical e-portfolio
during their teaching practicum. It consists in creating a web site, where they wrote a reflection per
week about the performance as teachers in the classroom, with the purpose of analyzing carefully
the different factors involved in the teaching practice. First, it was a tedious process as it
represented an extra task. However, later on, the reflections written weekly for feeding the e-
portfolio became a bible or main reference, because from the collected reflections it was possible to
get a meaningful learning process about what to do in unforeseen situations lived in the classroom
and to know how to address the teaching process. Nevertheless, in the development of the present
review paper it was figured out plenty of strategies to achieve the pedagogical reflection. In this
sense, it is important to highlight that all the strategies have a positive impact on in-service
teachers’ training, but it varies depending on what extent the student teachers take advantage of a
determined strategy for their personal and professional growth. Besides, it also depends of the
62
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
importance that programs and tutors give to the students’ reflections process; because it should
not be taken as a simple exercise but as a motor to start a long run.
Transcending beyond the classroom to conquer a transformative teaching
When it comes to education, giving value to the cultural aspects means to write a new chapter,
in which the possibility of a teaching-learning story with a happy end is reopened. By giving a
general overview in terms of education, it can be said that most of the teachers are still stuck in the
traditional system. Consequently, the focus of interest is the discipline content although it is far
from the students’ social context. However, “the goal of higher education now is not to provide
information or knowledge, but also to inspire students to be curious, courageous, creative and
critical” (Almabekova, 2010, p. 462). For that reason, it is necessary that teachers through
reflection develop the ability of making the accurate decisions that supply the requirements of the
teaching context (Cárdenas González & Álvarez, 2010, own translation) and to become an actor of
change in their community (Impedovo, Malik 2016).
In the education field, there must be a constant improvement in the teaching and learning
process in order to make part of the more and better educated countries. However, in Latin
American countries there is not a clue of a significant improvement based on the last standardized
test to international level. Based on the report of Gurría (2016) the test made in 2015 by The
Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) showed that these countries are below the
required average to be in the range of a good education. Meanwhile, there are encouraging news
about Colombian education, which got a higher percentage than before in the PISA test on the
different tested areas. For instance, Colombia got 425 points in reading comprehension, 416 points
in science and 390 points in mathematics; getting 22, 17 and 14 points respectively more than the
previous tests and occupying a better positions regarding the other countries. In terms of English
level around Colombia, the national test made in 2016 through Colombian Institute for the
Education Assessment, (ICFES by its acronym in Spanish); showed that there was an improvement
in the English language proof but the bigger percentage of students (41.09%) are still in the A-
level according the standards of the Common European Framework (Ministerio de Educación,
2016). It can be said that this fact turns into a stone of philosophizing for the Minister and
Secretary of Education, schools and teachers in order to reflect, analyze and rethink new strategies
for enriching the education and getting favorable results for Colombia in the coming international
and national assessments; causing a personal and professional growth in the society. Santillán
(2010) suggests that it should be developed a personal and professional growth sense in teachers,
which is necessary for the revalorization of the profession. He also stresses that if the teacher
63
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
profession is improved, the teaching quality will improve too. Then, students’ performance and
output in the national and international test will be better (own translation).
The educational systems do not provide a universal manual to perform the teaching practice due
to the academic contexts vary in an international, national and regional level. Hence, student
teachers and tutors should understand the importance of every single context, by giving a deep
look at a classroom to get familiarized with the community specific needs and to know what their
tasks and roles as transformative professionals within the educational context are, by immersing
themselves in a reflection process. In this sense, the relationship between community and school is
reciprocal. As a result, when there are changes in the student community, there must be changes
in the teaching practice to copy with the challenges this represents (Karm, 2010). Moreover, when
reading every single student, it cannot be ignored the fact that in a classroom there is a variety of
backgrounds to talk about. For example, in Caquetá classrooms what practitioners are going to be
exposed is not just simple learners but students with different realities (indigenous, displaced, low
and/or middle class, disabled and/or mistreated students) that make the teaching practice changes.
Then, taking the teaching process as a fragmented aspect of a society, makes training teachers fall
into a monotonous teaching that does not foster the abilities to reflect about the context where
they are. Through being socially connected to people from diverse backgrounds, awareness can be
raised about dynamics in our society (Giroux, 1988 cited by Carrington & Selva, 2010) “where
teachers can imagine their role as contributing to a better education for all” (Carrington & Selva,
2010, p. 9).
Teaching and learning English as a foreign language in a pluricultural context like Colombia is
full of barriers. To be clearer, the pluricultural context can be understood as the simultaneous
presence of two or more cultures in a territory and their possible interrelation (Bernabe, 2012 own
translation). Based on the information mentioned in the previous paragraph, practitioners can find a
variety of ethnic cultures in the Caquetá educational context, where the teaching practice turns into
a complex procedure regarding to the plenty of needs that require to be met by them. According to
the Administrative National Department of statistics (DANE, 2005) in Caqueta the 1, 43% of the
population represents the indigenous communities (Murui, Korebaju, Inga, Embera, Nasa, Misak,
Pijao and Andoque). Bringing up the authors’ experience as practitioners, it is crucial to stress that
the pedagogical reflection is a useful strategy to get the necessary skills to try new ways of
supplying not only the cognitive but also the human needs found in the school setting. Therefore,
ELT can be directed through campaigns within the educative community, where the use of the
English turns out to be in a bridge to become students aware about topics like racism, exclusion,
bullying, beliefs and so on, making stress in the values and its importance. In words of Núñez &
64
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
Téllez (2015), “reflection contributes to awaken teachers’ positive affect by providing cognitive and
affective interaction opportunities, and by humanizing teaching practices as essential pillars behind
teaching and learning purposes” (p. 67). Similarly, Saavedra and Saavedra (2015) discuss that “the
purposes of education are not confined to instruction and its hypothetical generation of learning,
but transcend human training” (p. 216 own translation). From this perspective, English teaching
should be taken as a vehicle to educate human beings rather than making it a reason for opening a
wider gap between teachers and students.
Another matter of concern for in-service teachers is the struggle to Change students’ paradigms
about learning the English subject. In the pedagogical practicum they might find that most students
have a wrong conception about English language learning. Students have been trained in a
traditional way, which makes stress in the theoretical part, so it is very difficult to develop
communicative competences; they ignore the fact that theory and practice go hand in hand to have
a meaningful learning process. In this way, student teachers should reflect and work cooperatively
within the teachinglearning context for creating new paradigms on education that change the
perception related to the English learning. In-service teachers need to be in a constant interaction
with the academic community to establish a dialogue with the colleagues and students’ families to
learn more about changing the environment and materials to support students’ learning (Impedovo
& Khatoon, 2016, P. 102). In the view of Taole (2012), reflective teachers can contribute to the
body of knowledge regarding to teaching and learning. He also stresses the importance of
collaboration among colleagues so that they can assist one another to improve their practice (p.2).
The current world: dancing with the post-millennial generation
The Post-modern world has brought significant changes that have influenced all the society
fields. Then, the education field is not an exception. Nowadays, most of the students in the
classrooms belong to the new generation, which is also called post-Millenials (Oblinger and
Oblinger, 2005) or genZers (Tulgan, 2013). According to Koulopoulos and Keldsen (2014),
“GenZers has a strong attachment to technology and the Internet. In fact, they do not know life
without the Internet and smartphones” (p. 84). In this way, the technology starts to be a
determinant factor in the current education. Thus, Adaptation in in-service teachers’ practice as a
mean to get students’ active involvement in their learning process is required. Nevertheless, this
exercise cannot be done if student teachers do not use the PR. Killen (2007) “defines reflective
competence as the ability to integrate performance with decision-making and understanding, and
adapting to change unforeseen circumstances” (p.99).
65
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
ELT Techniques, methods and strategies in order to fit in students’ needs and expectations
perfectly are needed to be reevaluated. Teachers need to make constantly decisions and adapt
their teaching to suite the diverse needs of learners in their classrooms (Taole, 2012). First and
foremost, in-service teachers are expected to rely on the PR to choose the accurate ELT strategies.
Therefore, the reflection helps practitioners to select, create or evaluate materials to ponder
learners’ needs, language learning and teaching theories and design meaningful and engaging
learning strategies to build effective learning settings (Téllez & ñez, 2015, p. 172). So, it is vital
that English practitioners/teachers interpret the context in which they are, to know students’
necessities and potentials, their English level and take into consideration the today trends, with the
purpose to realize what is needed stake out. In this way, they can contextualize their teaching aims
in order to transmit the appropriated and most relevant knowledge to the students. According to
Núñez, Téllez, Castellanos & Ramos (2009) (as cited by Nuñez & Tellez, 2015) “developing
materials gives teachers the possibility to reflect, innovate, create better teaching and learning
settings, and grow as individuals and professionals”. Besides, reflecting about the today world
represents a window to be closer to the students. Reflecting about the post-modern world enables
practitioners to know and to understand the set of characteristics regarding the post-millennial
generation’ life and learning styles which at the same time allows them rethink their pedagogical
conception and action. In the same line, Claudia Rodríguez (2009) affirms in one of her central
points that:
the conditions of the world today determine that a teacher has a high degree of responsibility in the
recognizing, reflecting upon and integrating the complexity of the post-modernist world into the
process of the formation of her/his students, with the purpose of contextualizing her/his teaching and
developing a transformative capability (p. 89).
All the past time was better. This is a saying predicated by old people, but it can be said the
XXI century provides new tools in terms of education. Every single century has brought up
innovative teaching methods to be implemented in the education of the respective age. The XXI
century gave way to a new chapter for education due to school community is living in a post-
modern world where the technology is indispensable for post-millennials. Then, using it means
facilitating the ELT. When in-service teachers use the media to teach the English language, there
will be an active students' learning involvement. In addition, “the use of teaching media places the
learner in a better position to use all their senses during learning thus creating the opportunity for
learners to become actively involved in the learning process” (Jacobs, Vakalisa & Gawe 2011:60,
cited by Taole, 2012).
66
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
Nowadays, the teaching profession demands to be able to keep up with the dynamic world.
Living in the globalized world, where it is necessary to establish a standard language, involves to
recognize that English has become the universal language. Keeping this in mind, in-service teachers
can take advantage of the importance of English in the current society to foster students’ skills
development, not only of English language but also of critical thinking and interest for the new
millennium requirements. “Teaching English in the particular conditions of the globalized, complex
and critical world determines new and urgent demands on the educational context, on the school
and on the English teacher” (Rodríguez, 2009. p 81). In her study, Rodriguez also points out that
“During the post-modernist age, in which we now live, the school has to prepare people to be
competitive and able to work in the globalized world” (p. 81-82). On the other hand, as it has been
remarked along this paper:
Teacher formation requires a reflection on the conditions in which teachers develop their work; a
reflection that goes beyond the institutional context to different aspects of human life such as the
social, cultural, economic, political, scientific, technological and environmental fields. The nature of the
world today dictates that teachers should make an effort to participate in its improvement (Rodríguez,
2009., p. 88).
It is indispensable in-service teachers are peer to peer with the globalized world by using PR in
order to meet the demands that the XXI century ELT.
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
Gathering all of the implications, it is concluded that the RP enables positive effects on student
teachers’ teaching practicum, due to in-service teachers become critical (Rodríguez, 2009; Minott,
2011 and Goh & Matthews, 2011), and competent professionals (Hyacinth, 2013 and Yıldız, et al.,
2016). Studies made in Colombia, England, Africa, Russia and Turkey figured out that pedagogical
reflection enhances in-service teachers’ awareness about their function as teachers. Furthermore,
they enrich constantly their teaching process and self-knowledge through reflection. As a result,
they get more confident. On the other hand, this study led to identify several strategies to reach an
accurate pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum. Furthermore, there is not a great
variation when it comes to the strategies used at the international, national and regional contexts.
The educational context where student teachers are emerged is the core to guide their teaching
practicum. Hence, We as English student teachers can conclude that the English Language teaching
it is not an isolated process. On the contrary, it must be taken as a factor of the society where
several factors (such as community needs, students’ background and realities, cultures interacting,
67
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
problems more outstanding, region history; and so on) play an important role, since they give the
starting point for practitioners to be aware in the selection of strategies to supply the needs found
in the educational context. In this sense, Lei (2007) maintains that it should be given a central role
to the students with the purpose of becoming the teaching process in a humanistic education
(p.60-61).
This study also uncovered several concerns regarding to the current educational domains, where
the Today world influences are revolutionizing the education paradigms and are putting
practitioners’ skills to the test in order to fit into the today training and its implications. Then, the
role that the reflection plays for current student teachers and/or tutors of any subject in this
instance, is to give them an understanding and an interpretation of the scholar setting and the
reality they are, and to open the curtain and show clearly to them what pieces do not work in their
teaching practice puzzle. Hence, there is a need to rethink the XXI century teachers’ formation. In
the words of Gulnara & Valeeva (2014), “the need for changes in modern education requires
formation of teachers’ reflexive position in pedagogical activity” (p.60).
Results in national and international tests have shown that teachers are not being well
prepared. Framed in improving Colombian education quality, government approved the bachelor
degree resolution 02041, which among other specifications, demands to strength the university
students’ teaching practice process to 50% credits minimum along the career. Taking this into
account, programs of higher education need to implement the pedagogical practicum from the first
semesters. Based on this fact, many questions appear like; will the programs adapt the syllabus
properly to get the students ready for their teaching practicum? Will the student teachers be
prepared to teach their specific field? Will they have the enough tools to face the daily classroom
challenges? Then it is important to highlight that the reflection process should be taken by the
programs, tutors and mostly for the practitioners so that they can get through a meaningful
progression and make accurate decisions. In this order of ideas, the PR turns into a vital tool for
every single practitioner of different study fields. The advisable process is that in-service teachers
should carry out a systematical reflection from the beginning of their teaching practicum so that
when they start studying theories related to the English teaching branches, they bear in mind the
previous observations in order to associate or to choose the appropriate strategies, methods or
approaches to perform their profession. In addition, we consider -after experiencing the
pedagogical practicum- that Reflection, teaching and learning is the trilogy that in-service teachers
need as tools for overcoming the classroom difficulties. In this sense, practitioners cannot hide
behind the excuse of having lack of experience.
68
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
All the studies read to write this paper talked about the experience of practitioners in urban
areas. However, it is important to highlight that there are many schools in rural areas in which
practitioners can develop or are developing their teaching practicum. Therefore, we suggest for
further studies make a search about the difference of student teachers’ performing process in rural
and urban contexts in order to establish the variable of each one of them. In this sense, it is also
important to analyze if the university bachelor programs are training to the future teachers
according to the current education policies and in an accurate way for facing the context where
they will be exposed during their teaching practicum, taking into account an inclusive education.
REFERENCIAS
Administrative National Department of statistics (DANE) (2005).
La visibilización estadística de los
grupos étnicos colombianos.
Retrieved from
https://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2005/etnia/sys/visibilidad_estadistica_etnicos.pdf
Al-Issa, A & Al-Bulushi, A. (2010). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become
Reflective Teachers.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education
, 35 (4), 40-64. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n4.4
Almabekova, O. (2010). Reflective Teaching in ESP.
Journal of Siberian Federal University.
Humanities & Social Sciences
, 3(3), 462-475.
Bailey, K. (1990).
"The Use of Diary Studies in Teacher Education Programs".
Inglaterrea:
Cambridge, U.K. and New York Second Language Teacher Education.
Bandura, A. (1986).
Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory
. New York:
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bernabe, M. (2012). Pluriculturalidad, multiculturalidad e intercultualralidad, conocimientos
necesarios para la labor docente.
Hekademos,
1(11), 67-76. Retrieved from
file:///E:/Downloads/Dialnet-PluriculturalidadMulticulturalidadEInterculturalid-
4059798%20(3).pdf
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012).
Supporting future-
oriented learning & teaching: A New Zealand perspective.
Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Boody, R. (2008) Teacher reflection as teacher change, and teacher change as moral response.
Education,
128(3), 498-506.
Brookfield, S. (1995).
Becoming a critically reflective teacher.
San Francisco: Jossey -Bass.
Bullock, A. & Hawk, P. (2001).
Developing a teacher portfolio: a guide for preservice and practicing
teachers.
New York: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
69
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
Cárdenas, M., González, A & Álvarez, J. (2010). El desarrollo profesional de los docentes de inglés
en ejercicio: algunas consideraciones conceptuales para Colombia.
Revista Folios,
(31), 20-
35.
Carrington, S & Selva, G. (2010) Critical social theory and transformative learning : evidence in
pre-service teachers’ service learning reflection logs.
Higher Education Research and
Development,
29(1), 45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360903421384
Cranton, P. (1996).
Professional development as transformative learning: New perspectives for
teachers of adults.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1933).
How we think: A restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the
Educative Process
. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Farrell, T. (1999). Teachers talking about teaching: Creating conditions for reflection.
Tesl-Ej
, 4(2),
1-16. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume4/ej14/ej14a1/?wscr
Farrell, T. (2003). Reflective teaching.
English Teaching Forum
, (2), 14-21.
Freeman, D & Richards, J. (1996).
Teacher learning in language teaching.
New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Gebhard, J. (1998). Second language teacher development and Korea.
The Korea TESOL Journal
, 1
(1), 1-10.
Gibbs, G & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills,
their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students.
Active Learning
in Higher Education,
5(1), 90100.
Goh, S & Matthews, B. (2011) "Listening To the Concerns of Student Teachers In Malaysia During
Teaching Practice,"
Australian Journal of Teacher Education:
36(3), 24-36. Available at:
http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss3/3
Gulnara, B, Valeeva R. (2014). Development of the teachers’ pedagogical reflection.
Life Sci
11(9),
60-63. Available at: http://www.lifesciencesite.com
Gungor, M. (2016). Turkish Pre-service Teachers’ Reflective Practices in Teaching English to Young
Learners.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education,
41(2), 136-151.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.9
Gurría, A. (2016).
2 PISA (Programme of International Student Assessment) 2015 Resultados Clave
.
OCDE (Organización para la coopewordración y el Desarrollo Económico). Available at:
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus-ESP.pdf
Hatton, N & Smith, D. (1995).
Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and
implementation.
Sydney: University of Sydney School of Teaching and Curriculum Studies.
Hyacinth, T. (2013). Reflection for specific purposes: the use of reflection by Nigerian English
language teachers.
Doctoral dissertation
, University of Warwick.
70
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
Impedovo, M. & Khatoon, S. (2016). Becoming a Reflective In-service Teacher: Role of Research
Attitude.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education,
41(1), 45-62. Retrieved from
http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol41/iss1/6
Jacobs, M, Vakalisa, N & Gawe, N. (2011).
Teaching-learning dynamics.
Cape Town: Pearson.
Karm, M., & Remmik, M. (2008, junio).
The impact of training of university teachers on their
approach to teaching and professional development.
Paper presented at the International
Consortium for Educational Development Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
Karm, M. (2010) Reflection tasks in pedagogical training courses, International
Journal for
Academic Development,
15(3), 203-214. DOI: http://10.1080/1360144X.2010.497681
Killen, R. (2007).
Teaching strategies for outcomes-based education
. South Africa, Cape Town:
Juta.
Koulopoulos, T & Keldsen, D. (2014). Multigenerational Perspectives on The Gen Z Effect.
Journal
of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture,
6(4), 83-87. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpoc.21205/pdf
Lei, Q. (2007). EFL teachers‟ factors and students‟ affect.
US-China Education Review,
4(3), 60-67.
DOI: http://10.2307/1170741
Maussa, E. (2011). La evaluación de desempeño y su aporte al desarrollo profesional y personal
del docente.
Revista Educación y Humanismo
. 13(21), 99-111.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2016).
Estudiantes de colegios oficiales mueven positivamente el
examen Saber 11°.
Bogota, Colombia.
Minott, M. (2011). The impact of a course in reflective teaching on student teachers at a local
university college.
Canadian Journal of Education,
34(2), 131-147. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ936747
Nicholls, G. (2001).
Professional development in higher education: New dimensions and directions
.
London: Kogan Page.
Núñez, A., Téllez M., Castellanos J., & Ramos B. (2009).
A practical materials development guide
for EFL pre-service, novice, and in-service teachers.
Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad
Externado de Colombia
Núñez, A. & Téllez, M. (2015). Reflection on teachers’ personal and professional growth through a
materials development seminar.
HOW,
22(2), 54-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.22.2.151
Oblinger, D & Oblinger, J. (2005):
Educating the Net Generation.
Washington, D.C.: EDUCAUSE.
Jacobs, M., Vakalisa, N & Gawe, N. (2011).
Teaching-learning dynamics.
Cape Town: Pearson.
71
Impact of pedagogical reflection in the teaching practicum from Caquetá practitioners`perspective: a literature review
Pennington, M. (1992). Reflecting on teaching and learning: A developmental focus for the second
language classroom.
Perspectives on second language teacher education,
(4), 47-65.
Pollard, A., & Tann, S. (1993).
Reflective teaching in the primary school A handbook for the
classroom
. London: Cassell.
Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching:
Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education.
Learning and Instruction,
18(1), 109120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
Pretorius, L. & Ford, A. (2016). Reflection for Learning: Teaching Reflective Practice at the
Beginning of University Study.
Executive Editor
, 28(2), 241-253. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1111149.pdf
Richards, J. (1992).
Content knowledge and instructional practice in second language teacher
education.
Estados Unidos: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and
Linguistics (GURT).
Richards, J. & Farrell, T. (2005).
Professional development for language teachers.
Retrieved from
http://www.langtoninfo.co.uk/webcontent/9780521849111frontmatter.pdf
Rodríguez, C. (2009). Evaluation in the Teaching Practicum of the English Program at the
Universidad de la Amazonía.
Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development,
(11), 79-
90.
Runhar, P., Sanders, K & Yang, H (2010). Stimulating teachers' reflection and feedback asking: An
interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership.
Teaching and Teacher Education,
(26), 11-54. DOI: https://10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.01
Santillán, F. (2010). La formación de docentes en Latinoamérica.
Revista Educación y Humanismo,
12(19), 133-147.
Sezer, R. (2008). Integration of Critical Thinking Skills into Elementary School Teacher Education
Courses in Mathematics.
Education,
128(3), 349-362.
Shon, D. (1995).
The Reflective Practitioner.
London: Arena.
Spilková, V. (2004).
Současné proměny vzdělávání učitelů
. Brno: Paido.
Taole, M. (2012). Reflective experiences of Post Graduate Certificate in Education students during
teaching practice.
Research in Higher Education Journal
, (4), 25-32.
Thorne, C. & Qiang, W. (1996). Action research in language teacher education.
ELT Journal,
50
(3), 254-261.
Tulgan, B. (2013).
Meet Generation Z: The second generation within the giant "Millennial" cohort.
Rainmaker Thinking. Retrieved from
http://www.rainmakerthinking.com/assets/uploads/2013/10/Gen-Z-Whitepaper.pdf
72
Andrés Artunduaga-Angélica Rojas Isaz- Derly Muñoz
Wallace, M. (1991).
Training Foreign Language Teachers: A Reflective Approach.
United Kingdom:
Cambridge: University Press.
Yang, Sh. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice.
Educational
Technology and Society
, 12(2): 11-21. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.554.4498&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Yıldız, M., Geçikli, M., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2016). Turkish Prospective English Teachers' Reflections on
Teaching Practice.
Universal Journal of Educational Research
, 4(4), 696-703. DOI:
http://10.13189/ujer.2016.040406
73