473
6. Ward MM, Jaana M, Natafgi N. Systematic review of telemedicine applications in emergency
rooms. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(9):601-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.009
7. Saigi-Rubió F, Jiménez-Zarco A, Torrent-Sellens J. Determinants of the intention to use
telemedicine: evidence from primary care physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.
2016;32(1-2):29-36. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462316000015
8. Saigí-Rubió F, Torrent-Sellens J, Jiménez-Zarco A. Drivers of telemedicine use: comparative
evidence from samples of Spanish, Colombian and Bolivian physicians. Implement Sci.
2014;9:128. Published 2014 Oct 8. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0128-6
9 Telesalud Universidad de Caldas [Internet]. 2020 [citado 1 noviembre 2020]. Disponible en:
https://coronavirustelesalud.com/
10. Davis, Fred D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information
Technology.” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, 1989, pp. 319–340. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/249008
11. Keshvari H, Haddadpoor A, Taheri B, Nasri M, Aghdak P. Survey determinant factors of
telemedicine strategic planning from the managers and experts perspective in the health
department, isfahan university of medical sciences. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(5):320-324.
DOI: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.320-324
12. Chau, Patrick Y. K., and Paul J. Hu. “Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by
Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 18,
no. 4, 2002, pp. 191–229. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/40398548
13. Triandis HC. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1980;27:195-259.
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory
and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Orruño Aguado E, Manrique Martínez M, Aguirrebeitia Celaya I, Gagnon M-P, Asua Batarrita J,
Bayón Yusta J, et al. Evaluación de la implantación de la telemedicina diagnóstica en el ámbito
de la dermatología. Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad
y Politica Social. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del País Vasco; 20 [Internet].
2012. Report No.: 2009/02. Disponible en:
http://www.osakidetza.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/2013_osteba_publicacion/es_def/adj
untos/Implantacion_WEB.PDF
16. Orruño E, Gagnon MP, Asua J, Ben Abdeljelil A. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-
care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model. J Telemed Telecare.
2011;17(6):303-307. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101101
17. Pereyra Rodríguez J. Determinantes del uso de la telemedicina en una Organización Sanitaria
[Maestría]. Universidad Oberta de Cataluña;
2017. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6905102
18. Schepers J, Wetzels M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating
subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf Manag. 2007 Jan;44(1):90–103. DOI:
10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
19. Roig F., Saigí F.. Elementos facilitadores en la implantación de servicios de telemedicina:
Perspectiva de los profesionales implicados en su diseño y puesta en marcha. Anales Sis San
Navarra [Internet]. 2011 Ago [citado 2020 Nov 02] ; 34( 2 ): 235-244. Disponible en: DOI:
10.4321/S1137-66272011000200009
20. Zailani S, Gilani MS, Nikbin D, Iranmanesh M. Determinants of telemedicine acceptance in selected
public hospitals in Malaysia: clinical perspective. J Med Syst. 2014;38(9):111. DOI:
10.1007/s10916-014-0111-4
21. Segrelles-Calvo G, Chiner E, Fernández-Fabrellas E. Acceptance of telemedicine among
healthcare professionals. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(12):611-612. DOI:
10.1016/j.arbres.2015.08.002