19
From a medical approach, Hamilton and col-
leagues (2008), (Padubidri, Menezes, Pant, & Shetty,
2013), Lucena, et al., (2009); Hebert, Maleki, Vasovic,
Arnold, Steinberg & Prystowsky (2014); Park, Huh,
Piao, Kim, & Hwang, (2013); Colville-Ebeling, Freeman,
Banner, & Lynnerup, (2014); Sinard (2013) and Tette,
Yawson, & Tettey (2014); Elder, (2007); Yayci, Pakis,
Karapirli, Celik, Uysal, & Polat, (2011); Subedi, Yadav,
Jha, Paudel, & Regmi, (2013) used autopsies to verify
diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s
and Alzheimer’s disease, aneurysms and several other
diseases or to address educational practices in order to
improve autopsy adult and paediatrical education.
Newton, Coffin, Clark, & Lowichik, (2004)
and Hull, Nazarian, Wheeler, Black-Schaffer, & Mark,
(2007), Wong, Chan, Beh, Yau, Yip, & Hawton, (2010);
Flach and colleagues, (2014); Mohammed & Kharo-
shah, (2014); Inokuchi, and colleagues, (2014); Yeow,
Mahmud, & Raj, (2014); Matsumoto, Sengoku, Saito,
Kakuta, Murayama, & Imafuku, (2014); Ifteni, Correl,
Burtea, Kane, & Manu, (2014); Le Blanc-Louvry, Th-
ureau, Lagroy de Croutte, Ledoux, Dacher, & Proust,
(2014) and Kodaka, and colleagues, (2014) note that au-
topsies still remain important to medicine to strength-
en the pathologist-internist collaboration and to make
clearer diagnosis or unexpected pathologic findings.
In exactly this same direction, Burton & Underwood,
(2007) state that autopsy has been often underused in
modern clinical practice but it is an important proce-
dure with potential to advance medical knowledge and
part of its relevance comes from its epidemiological,
educational, forensic and clinical value.
There has been other topics related to autopsies
like the knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and the way
relatives react to that forensic procedure, like those
made by Ogata, Nishi, & Maeda, (2009) and Oluwasola,
Fawole, Otegbayo, Ogun, Adebamowo, & Bamigboye,
(2009) that assesed this type of constructs finding that it
is difficult to obtain consent from relatives of deceased
patients in a Nigerian Tertuary Institution and that only
38 % of relatives had satisfactory knowledge about the
procedure.
From a psychological perspective, there are psy-
chological autopsies that help to understand the possible
reasons behind a suicide or suspicious deaths, like the
studies conducted by van Spijker, Graafsma; Dullaart &
Kerkhof (2009); Wong, Chan, Beh, Yau, Yip, & Haw-
ton, (2010) and Yücel Beyaztas, Bütün, Özer, & Celik,
(2013), Kizza, Hjelmeland, Kinyanda, & Knizek, (2012),
Paraschakis, Michopoulos, Douzenis, Christodoulou,
Koutsaftis, & Lykouras, (2012), Ahmed, de Jager, Haigh,
& Garrard, (2013) and Henry & Greenfield, (2009),
that analyze personality factors involved on the deaths
and suicides retrospectivily in order to make predictions
around their deaths based on their personality profile.
This article is only intended to provide data to the
scientific investigation of the killings, so its interest is
purely academic, it doesn’t attempt to specifically inves-
tigate in itself any information relating to any particular
criminal.
In the present study we found a high incidence of
male homicide victims in killings (94.2 %). This, shows
a concordance with global figures of homicides where
men comprise the vast majority (77 %). However, it is
clear that global figures do not specify the modalities of
homicides, so its incidence in males, despite having a
majority in both studies, in the present study significant-
ly exceeds global figures. Given this lack of information
provided by global data shows, there is a need to investi-
gate the variable “homicide killings” to be more specific
MOISES ROBERTO MEBARAK CHAMS, ALBERTO DE CASTRO, JEAN DAVID POLO VARGAS, MABEL MORALES LOPEZ,
DIEGO VILLABONA, JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ VARGAS, JUAN CAMILO TOVAR CASTRO
Psicogente, 20 (37): pp. 12-24. Enero-Junio, 2017. Universidad Simón Bolívar. Barranquilla, Colombia. ISSN 0124-0137 EISSN 2027-212X
http://publicaciones.unisimonbolivar.edu.co/rdigital/psicogente/index.php/psicogente