Derechos de autor 2021 Ablamskyi Serhii Yevhenovych
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor; garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que, se indique su autor y su primera publicación a esta revista. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Violación sustancial de los derechos humanos y las libertades como requisito previo para la inadmisibilidad de las pruebas
Corresponding Author(s) : Liudmyla Volodymyrivna Havryliuk
Justicia,
Vol. 26 Núm. 39 (2021): Enero-Junio
Resumen
Objetivo: El objetivo del artículo es analizar las distintas disposiciones legales y teóricas relacionadas con la determinación del contenido legal del concepto de declarar inadmisible la prueba por violación sustancial de los derechos humanos y las libertades. Método: Los autores utilizan métodos científicos generales y especiales que permiten obtener conclusiones y propuestas científicamente sólidas. En particular, se aplican métodos científicos, tales como dialéctico, comparativo-legal, sistema-estructural, generalización y lógico. Resultados: Se estudian las cuestiones problemáticas del procedimiento para declarar inadmisible la prueba debido a una violación sustancial de los derechos humanos y las libertades en el proceso penal de Ucrania. Se están enfocando algunas violaciones esenciales en la recolección de pruebas por parte de la fiscalía. Se analiza la jurisprudencia del TEDH en materia de procedimiento para declarar inadmisible la prueba. Se considera la implementación de la doctrina del “fruto del árbol venenoso” y la especificidad de su aplicación a la prueba directa y derivada por los tribunales nacionales y la jurisprudencia del CEDH. Conclusiones: Los autores argumentan que el investigador está obligado a cumplir con el procedimiento para las acciones de investigación prescrito por las disposiciones del CPC de Ucrania, con el fin de garantizar los derechos humanos y las libertades. El análisis de la aplicación de las disposiciones del CPC de Ucrania y la jurisprudencia del CEDH con respecto a la cuestión planteada permite formular conclusiones sólidas.
Palabras clave
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Criminal Procedure Codes of Ukraine of 13 April 2012. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651.
- Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of the Security Service of Ukraine with regard to the official interpretation of the provisions of the third part of Article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine No. 12-рп/2011. (20 October 2011). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v012p710-1.
- Drozd V., Rusnak Iu., Olishevskyi O., Hapotii V., & Minkova, O. (2019). Obtaining samples for examination in criminal proceedings: problems of normative regulation and law enforcement. Georgian Medical News, 7–8 (292-293), 129–134.
- Drozd, V., Luchenko, D., Ablamskiy, S., & Vatras, V. (2019). Forensic examinations appointed at the investigation of crimes committed against journalists. Amazonia Investiga, 8 (24), 130–137. Р.131.
- Drozdov, O., Drozdova, O., & Shulgin, S. (2020). Can fair court “utilize” fruit of the poisonous tree: International historical review and national realities. Retrieved from https://www.echr.com.ua/chi-mozhe-spravedlivij-sud-uzhivati-plodi-otruyenogo-dereva-mizhnarodnij-istorichnij-ekskurs-ta-nacionalni-reali%D1%97/?fbclid=IwAR17Ak.
- Judgment of Dniprovskyi District Court of Kyiv of May 2. 2018. Case no. 755/11422/17. Retrieved from https://app.pravosud.com.ua/search/#.
- Lazebnyi, L. (2020). Finding evidence as “fruit of the poisonous tree”, the court must establish a connection between “tree” and “fruit”. Retrieved from https://lexinform.com.ua/sudova-praktyka/vyznayuchy-dokazy-plodamy-otruyenogo-dereva-sud-maye-vstanovyty-zv-yazok-mizh-derevom-i-plodamy/.
- Mazalov, A. (2018). Admissibility of evidence according to the latest amendments to the CP of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://blog.liga.net/user/amazalov/article/30462.
- Osetrova, E. S. (2016). Recognition of evidence inadmissible in criminal proceedings: Candidates of juridical sciences' thesis in specialty 12.00.09 «criminal process and criminal investigation; forensic expertise; operative investigative activity». National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv. 22 p.
- Panova, A. V. (2017). Recognition of evidence inadmissible in criminal proceedings: monograph. Kharkiv: Pravo, 256 p.
- Pashin, S. A. (1996). Evidence in the Russian criminal procedure. In Sostyazatelnoye pravosudiye: tr. nauch.-prakt. lab. Moskva: Mezhdunar. kom. sodeystviya pravovoy reforme, 1 (2), 311–390.
- Ponomarenko, А.V., Havryliuk, L.V., Anheleniuk, A. M.Y., & Drozd, V.G. (2020). Inadmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9 (29), 147–155. P. 150.
- Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 8 October 2019. Proceedings no. 51-8259км18. Retrieved from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85238666.
- Ruling of the Appellate Court of the Kherson region of 02 April 2015. Proceeding no. 11-kp/791/331/15. Retrieved from https://protocol.ua/ua/sud_dokaz_otrimaniy_bez_dozvolu_slidchogo_suddi_na_obshuk_gitla_e_nedopustimim/.
- Ruling of the Supreme Specialized Court of Ukraine regarding the consideration of civil of 12 May 2016. Proceedings no. 5-1193km16. Retrieved from https://protocol.ua/ua/vssu_operativna_zakupka_narkotichnih_zasobiv_moge_provoditis_lishe_u_razi_vnesennya_vidomostey_pro_zlochin_do_erdr/9.
- Studennykov, S. (2019). The doctrine of “fruit of the poisonous tree”: How it is used by the courts. Retrieved from https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/154876-doktrina-plodiv-otruynogo-dereva-yak-yiyi-zastosovuyut-sudi.
- Tertyshnyk, V. M. (2017). Criminal proceedings of Ukraine. 7th ed. K.: Alerta, 840 p.
- Tiutiunnyk, V. V. (2015). Institute of evidences’ admissibility as a guarantee to adoption of lawful and reasonable court decision: Thesis for the degree of candidate of legal sciences, specialty 12.00.09 «criminal process and criminalistics and forensics, investigation and search operations». National Law University, named after Yaroslav the Wise, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Kharkiv, 220 p.
- Tiutiunnyk, V.V. (2013). The impact of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the development of the concept of admissibility of evidence in the criminal procedure of Ukraine. Yryst Ukrainy, 3 (24), 82-87. Kharkiv.
- Yakub, M. L. (1974). Problems of evidence assessment in the Soviet criminal procedure. Vestnik Moskovskogo universitetata. Pravo, 6, 20.
- Zhogin, N. V. (ed.) (1973). The theory of evidence in the Soviet criminal procedure. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 735 p.
Referencias
Criminal Procedure Codes of Ukraine of 13 April 2012. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651.
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of the Security Service of Ukraine with regard to the official interpretation of the provisions of the third part of Article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine No. 12-рп/2011. (20 October 2011). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v012p710-1.
Drozd V., Rusnak Iu., Olishevskyi O., Hapotii V., & Minkova, O. (2019). Obtaining samples for examination in criminal proceedings: problems of normative regulation and law enforcement. Georgian Medical News, 7–8 (292-293), 129–134.
Drozd, V., Luchenko, D., Ablamskiy, S., & Vatras, V. (2019). Forensic examinations appointed at the investigation of crimes committed against journalists. Amazonia Investiga, 8 (24), 130–137. Р.131.
Drozdov, O., Drozdova, O., & Shulgin, S. (2020). Can fair court “utilize” fruit of the poisonous tree: International historical review and national realities. Retrieved from https://www.echr.com.ua/chi-mozhe-spravedlivij-sud-uzhivati-plodi-otruyenogo-dereva-mizhnarodnij-istorichnij-ekskurs-ta-nacionalni-reali%D1%97/?fbclid=IwAR17Ak.
Judgment of Dniprovskyi District Court of Kyiv of May 2. 2018. Case no. 755/11422/17. Retrieved from https://app.pravosud.com.ua/search/#.
Lazebnyi, L. (2020). Finding evidence as “fruit of the poisonous tree”, the court must establish a connection between “tree” and “fruit”. Retrieved from https://lexinform.com.ua/sudova-praktyka/vyznayuchy-dokazy-plodamy-otruyenogo-dereva-sud-maye-vstanovyty-zv-yazok-mizh-derevom-i-plodamy/.
Mazalov, A. (2018). Admissibility of evidence according to the latest amendments to the CP of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://blog.liga.net/user/amazalov/article/30462.
Osetrova, E. S. (2016). Recognition of evidence inadmissible in criminal proceedings: Candidates of juridical sciences' thesis in specialty 12.00.09 «criminal process and criminal investigation; forensic expertise; operative investigative activity». National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv. 22 p.
Panova, A. V. (2017). Recognition of evidence inadmissible in criminal proceedings: monograph. Kharkiv: Pravo, 256 p.
Pashin, S. A. (1996). Evidence in the Russian criminal procedure. In Sostyazatelnoye pravosudiye: tr. nauch.-prakt. lab. Moskva: Mezhdunar. kom. sodeystviya pravovoy reforme, 1 (2), 311–390.
Ponomarenko, А.V., Havryliuk, L.V., Anheleniuk, A. M.Y., & Drozd, V.G. (2020). Inadmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9 (29), 147–155. P. 150.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 8 October 2019. Proceedings no. 51-8259км18. Retrieved from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85238666.
Ruling of the Appellate Court of the Kherson region of 02 April 2015. Proceeding no. 11-kp/791/331/15. Retrieved from https://protocol.ua/ua/sud_dokaz_otrimaniy_bez_dozvolu_slidchogo_suddi_na_obshuk_gitla_e_nedopustimim/.
Ruling of the Supreme Specialized Court of Ukraine regarding the consideration of civil of 12 May 2016. Proceedings no. 5-1193km16. Retrieved from https://protocol.ua/ua/vssu_operativna_zakupka_narkotichnih_zasobiv_moge_provoditis_lishe_u_razi_vnesennya_vidomostey_pro_zlochin_do_erdr/9.
Studennykov, S. (2019). The doctrine of “fruit of the poisonous tree”: How it is used by the courts. Retrieved from https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/154876-doktrina-plodiv-otruynogo-dereva-yak-yiyi-zastosovuyut-sudi.
Tertyshnyk, V. M. (2017). Criminal proceedings of Ukraine. 7th ed. K.: Alerta, 840 p.
Tiutiunnyk, V. V. (2015). Institute of evidences’ admissibility as a guarantee to adoption of lawful and reasonable court decision: Thesis for the degree of candidate of legal sciences, specialty 12.00.09 «criminal process and criminalistics and forensics, investigation and search operations». National Law University, named after Yaroslav the Wise, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Kharkiv, 220 p.
Tiutiunnyk, V.V. (2013). The impact of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the development of the concept of admissibility of evidence in the criminal procedure of Ukraine. Yryst Ukrainy, 3 (24), 82-87. Kharkiv.
Yakub, M. L. (1974). Problems of evidence assessment in the Soviet criminal procedure. Vestnik Moskovskogo universitetata. Pravo, 6, 20.
Zhogin, N. V. (ed.) (1973). The theory of evidence in the Soviet criminal procedure. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 735 p.