Associated roles of onlookers in school bullying: validation of a scale to detect them School violence: a scale to detect types of onlookers. School violence: a scale to detect types of onlookers.

Main Article Content

José Ángel Vera-Noriega https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-4431
Elsa González González https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-6948
Martha Peña-Ramos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-8781
Francisco Durazo-Salas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-6953

Keywords

Abstract

Abstract


Objective: this paper aims to validate the scale of onlookers which is part of the instrument of associated roles of bullying from Belacchi and Farina (2010). Method: was measured in public middle schools with a representative sample of young people aged between 12 to 17 years old in the state of Sonora, México; the scale measures different dimensions of action against a bullying situation, having 19 items in Likert scale of five answer choices. The data were processed following the item response theory: Rasch calibration reagents, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis using SPSS with AMOS. Results: the psychometric parameters obtained in the confirmatory model are: CFI = 0,96; GFI = 0,96; RMSEA = 0,05; Cronbach´s alpha= 0,82; the findings show three-dimensions: Assistant (pro aggressor), Defender (pro victim) and Outsider (not participating). Conclusion: The three types of observers found contrast with the five and seven roles initially contemplated. Differences in terms of ecological validity are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 197 | PDF (Español (España)) Downloads 168

References

Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A. & Moffitt, T. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in yung children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, (118), 130-138. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2388
Belacchi, C. & Farina E. (2010). Prosocial/Hostile roles and emotion comprehension in preschoolers. Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 371-389.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-46.
Besag, V. (1989). Bullies and Victims in Schools. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Cappadocia, M., Pepler, D., Cummings, J., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivation and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, (27), 201-216. http://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512450567
Cepeda, E., Pacheco, P. & García, B. (2008). Bullying amongst students attending state basic and middle schools. Revista Salud Pública, 10(4), 517-528.
Chávez, C. & Saade, A. (2009). Procedimientos básicos para el análisis de reactivos. México: Centro Nacional de Evaluación para la Educación Superior, A.C. (Ceneval). Recuperado de http://archivos.ceneval.edu.mx/archivos_portal/2668/08Procedimientosbasicos.pdf
Cobo, P. & Tello, R. (2008). Bullying en México. Conducta violenta en niños y adolescentes. Ciudad de México: Quarzo.
Demaray, M., Summers, K., Jenkins, L., & Becker, L. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ) Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of school violence, (15), 158-188. Doi: http://doi.org./10.1080/153.88220.2014.964801
Elliot, M. (2008). Intimidación. Una guía práctica para combatir el miedo en las escuelas. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Escobar-Pérez, J. & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, (6), 27-36.
Espegale, D., Hong, J., Rao, M., & Low, S. (2013). Associations between peer victimization and academic performance. Theory into Practice, (52), 233-240. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.829724
Garaigordobil, M. & Machimbarrena, J. (2017). Stress, competence, and parental educational styles in victims and aggressors of bullying and cyberbullying. Psicothema, (29), 335-340. Doi: htpp://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.258
González-Montesinos, M. (2014). El Análisis de Reactivos con el Modelo Rasch Manual. Técnico A Serie: Medición y Metodología. México: Universidad de Sonora/Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.
González, E., Peña, M. & Vera, J. (2017). Validación de una escala de roles de víctimas y agresores asociados al acoso escolar. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(1), 224-239.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black, W. (1999). Análisis Multivariante (5ta ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Higuita-Guitíerrez, L., & Cardona-Arias, A. (2017). Variables of the family, school, and social, environment context that determine bullying in adolescents in Medellin, Colombia, 2014. Journal of School Violence, (16), 1-19. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/153882202015.1112807
Hinduja, S. & Patching, J. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyber bullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Crown Press.
Manzano, A. & Zamora, S. (2009). Sistema de ecuaciones estructurales: una herramienta de investigación. México: Centro Nacional de Evaluación para la Educación Superior, A.C. (Ceneval).
Mendoza, B., Rojas, C., & Barrera, A. (2017). Rol de participación en bullying y su relación con la ansiedad. Perfiles Educativos, XXXIX (158), 38-51
Morales-Vallejo, P. (2008). Estadística aplicada a las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas.
Oluwatayo, J. (2012, May). Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational Research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391-400. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n2.391
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwells.
Olweus, D. (1998). Conductas de acoso y amenaza entre escolares. Madrid: Morata. (Orig. 1993).
Olweus, D. (2001). Olweus’ core program against bullying and antisocial behavior: A teacher handbook. Bergen, Norway: Research Centre for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center).
Perren, S. & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental, (9), 195-209. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643168
Piñuel, I. & Oñate, A. (2008). Informe Cisneros VII. Violencia y acoso escolar en alumnos de primaria, ESO y bachiller [Internet]. Informe preliminar. Instituto de Innovación Educativa y Desarrollo Directivo. Recuperado de http://www.internenes.com/acoso/docs/ICAM.pdf
Pöyhönen, V., Junoven, J. & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding whit the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situation. Social Development, 21, 722-741. http://doi-org/10.1111/j.14679507.2012.00662.x
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G. Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders’ behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, (61), 87-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Österman, K. & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
Susana, A. & Urbina, S. (1998). Tests psicológicos. México: Prentice Hall.
Twemlow, S., Fonagy, P. & Sacco, F. (2014). The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in the school and communities. Annals New York Academic of Sciences, (1036), 215-232. http://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1330.014
Volk, A., Dane, A. & Marini, Z. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, 327-343. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2 014.09.001
Wright, B. & Linacre, J. (1991). Winsteps Rasch Measurement Computer Program. Chicago: MESA Press.